Archive for November 2010

Data Compression for Backup and Recovery

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

Shopping for a data protection solution to help you optimize backup and recovery can be time-consuming… and confusing. After all, in order to find the “best fit,” you need to be certain that each individual element of the solution makes sense for your unique IT environment.

In an earlier post, we outlined specific considerations for organizations looking to get the down low on data deduplication. Here, we’ll focus on what they need to look for regarding data compression.

It’s best when data reduction (compression/deduplication) is done on the source system before data is sent over the LAN/WAN (rather than after network transfer with a dedupe appliance solution or backend compression/dedupe combo at the media server [aka vault]).  Look for an agent-based solution that deduplicates and compresses only the new and changed data blocks at the source, minimizing the data over the wire and improving the backup performance.

When you perform compression along with backend dedupe – after the data transfer – it will only help with backend storage footprint; it won’t help with bandwidth usage.  And employing a separate dedupe appliance may complicate day-to-day management if you ever need to restore.  Additionally, this type of solution requires an onsite appliance to work. While onsite data protection appliances provide many benefits they should not be a prerequisite for timely protection and recovery of data.

When you’re evaluating data compression of a backup system to see how it will impact your network, look for one that is:

  • Compatible with your production environment. Do you know how much data will be “pushed” across your network as part of the backup process? Be sure your network can effectively tolerate the new level of compressed data that’s being transmitted. In most cases, compression technology frees network bandwidth for other common network activities. But occasionally, compression can cause transmission bottlenecks because it creates more backup data than your production network can handle.
  • Adjustable. Some solutions maintain backup speed with little or no customer control. Would you rather have one that’s more tailored to your network? If so, look for data compression that can be customized to the specific needs of your operating environment.
  • Adaptable. Does your network have large amounts of bandwidth available for backup, or is it bandwidth-constrained? Does that bandwidth availability change during off-hours and peak production times?  The data protection solution you choose should include compression technology that adapts to the amount of available bandwidth in your particular IT environment.

Finding a data protection solution that best fits your needs doesn’t have to be difficult. Just proceed methodically. Ask questions. And be certain that each solution component agrees with your network parameters – and with your expectations.

For more tips about choosing a backup and recovery system, check out our new white paper, “Deduplication and Beyond: Optimizing Performance for Backup and Recovery,” available here.

Share

Cloud Backup for the Channel – Introducing the EVault Cloud-Connected Service Provider Program

Wednesday, November 17th, 2010

Today we launched a breakthrough channel program that gives Value Added Resellers (VARs) the ability to offer their own Cloud backup and recovery service that is both powered AND protected by EVault. The EVault® Cloud-Connected Service Provider (CCSP) program is a unique channel offering that packages EVault technology and best practices to help participating VARs quickly build a profitable, multi-tenant cloud-based data protection service-backed by i365 expertise, EVault technology, and the EVault Cloud. In fact, EVault CCSP pilot partners in North America and Europe were already generating recurring revenue streams within 2-4 weeks of getting started in the program.

The program alleviates the biggest challenges the channel faces, when either trying to improve an existing Cloud backup offering or extending their business into the Cloud for the first time, by eliminating the high costs, high risks, and long learning curves associated with developing a hosting infrastructure and recurring revenue stream business model. EVault CCSP partners receive comprehensive training, enablement and support to build, market, sell and operate a Cloud backup business, leveraging i365’s 13 years of experience delivering professional-grade Cloud-Connected data protection to small and mid-size businesses.

EVault CCSP pilot partner Jean-Christophe Pari, director of technology at NOEVA said:

“Evault CCSP brings mid-size IT services companies turnkey features to develop a credible Cloud offering for clients; it has proven technology, complete and reliable software agents and best of class compression and deduplication algorithms, as well as an innovative and an evolutionary licensing model. Based on this program, NOEVA has quickly built and marketed a very strong, online back-up Cloud offering.”

The EVault CCSP program’s all-in-one online backup and recovery appliance bundles pre-configured hardware, storage, EVault Software, and unlimited agents and plug-ins, optimized for a hosted service environment, accelerating a partner’s time to market and bringing the Cloud closer to the customer. In addition, customers’ backup data can be replicated to the EVault Cloud, giving CCSP partners and their customers a multi-site disaster recovery plan for their data.

For more about EVault CCSP, read the press release here.

Share

ESG Lab Reviews EVault for DPM

Monday, November 15th, 2010

Recently Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) Lab engineers Ginny Roth and Tony Palmer visited our headquarters in Santa Clara to get some hands-on time with our EVault for Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager (EVault for DPM) all-in-one backup and recovery solution for Microsoft-centric, mixed computing environments. ESG Lab provides in-depth testing and analysis of Data Center technology products for companies of all types and sizes, and evaluates a product’s capabilities to provide insight into why – and how – these capabilities matter to customers.

Ginny and Tony took a test drive of EVault for DPM in a lab environment that consisted of one appliance protecting Windows files, a Microsoft SQL Server, a VMware ESX server, and a Windows XP laptop. In particular, the ESG Lab engineers looked at the ease of deployment and level of protection and found:

EVault for DPM provides an easy to deploy appliance that takes the complexity out of implementing a cross-platform data protection solution… With secure cloud connectivity, EVault for DPM provides IT administrators with peace of mind as they know their data is always available for disaster recovery. Priced for small to mid-sized businesses, EVault for DPM also provides an excellent option for enterprises’ remote/branch offices with its simple deployment and management.

Click here to see more of ESG Lab’s  insights about EVault for DPM  in this review.

Share

The Truth About Data Protection for Virtual Environments

Tuesday, November 9th, 2010

We all know the time-tested adage that says, “You can’t teach an old dog new tricks.”

Well, the same goes for backup and recovery solutions.

Modern heterogeneous IT environments demand technology that can work across assorted servers –whether they’re onsite, over a wide network area, or even extending into the cloud.  Backup and recovery for virtualized servers is particularly complex, and if you try to apply yesterday’s methodology (the old dog) to today’s virtualization paradigm (the new tricks), you’ll be setting yourself up for a whole set of thorny problems.

But, just what kind of challenges are we talking about? Why is it so complicated to integrate solutions among physical servers and virtual machines (VMs)? Consider the following:

  1. When backup operations that were originally spread across multiple physical servers are performed from a single physical server, you’ll be unable to protect your data within the available backup window. Once the CPU demand exceeds the amount that can be realistically handled by a single physical server, any of the efficiencies achieved by improved resource utilization will be lost to degraded system performance.
  2. Installing more backup agents simply creates more potential points of failure. As a result, you may have to dedicate additional resources to monitor the backup process, track multiple log files, ensure that backups are being performed correctly and determine backup reliability in case of a site failure or disaster.
  3. VM sprawl is a side effect of virtualization and can quickly erode the cost savings achieved by consolidating physical servers when you purchase backup agent licenses for each guest VM. This hidden cost can be mitigated by using VM agents that back up data at the host level ignoring the actual number of VM’s that run on the virtualized server.
  4. Failures happen. Unless IT performs a bare metal backup of guest operating systems, a server disaster can result in weeks of trying to recover down systems. Although the VMs can be rebuilt relatively quickly, the pain associated with recovering data using the conventional approach still remains.

As IT environments become more and more complicated, it’s now critical to move beyond traditional approaches. After all, backing up individual operating systems, applications and their associated data is no longer sufficient. Instead, we recommend using updated technology that allows you to back up virtual machines as a single entity. Or, as another adage succinctly puts it, “Out with the old and in with the new!” For more information about how server virtualization impacts data backup and recovery, see our white paper, “Developing a Data Protection Strategy for Virtual Server Environments,” available here.

Posted by Rachna Raina

Share