Archive for May 2011

IT Downtime and Disaster Recovery Planning

Thursday, May 26th, 2011

We recently came across some interesting data from a vendor-sponsored survey of 200 companies across North America and Europe in this InformationWeek article. While the headline focused on the economic impact of IT downtime, calculating it at billions of dollars of lost revenue due to IT outages, what was more fascinating was the number of organizations still not properly preparing in the event of disaster.

The article states that:

On average, the businesses surveyed said they suffered 14 hours of IT downtime per year. Half of those said IT outages damage their reputation and 18% described the impact on their reputation as “very damaging.”

In addition,

Of the 200 companies surveyed, small enterprises lost, on average, more than $55,000 in revenue due to IT failures each year, while midsize companies lost more than $91,000 and large companies lost more than $1,000,000. A data center outage by itself can cost an average of $5,600 per minute.

So you would think, disaster recovery planning to protect critical systems and data would be a top priority, especially when “87% of businesses indicated that failure to recover data would be damaging to the business and 23% said it would be “disastrous.”"

But despite the well-documented costs and risks, it is still surprising the survey found that:

56% of enterprises in North America and 30% in Europe don’t have a formal and comprehensive disaster recovery policy.

As we have advocated many times on this blog, every organization, especially SMBs, should have a DR plan in place. To borrow from a New York Times article on the topic,  “the best preparation for any situation you may face is to have a well-thought-out plan in place.” And using an integrated system and data recovery solution should be an essential component of that plan.

Share

Arizona Credit Union Drops Tape for EVault Backup Appliances

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

There’s been plenty of talk lately at industry events and via social media channels about the continuing use of tape in organizations for data protection purposes. For certain use cases, tape backup may still make sense. However for those small to mid-sized organizations, as well as remote offices of large enterprises, wanting to properly protect systems and data, decrease backup windows  and meet  stringent  Recovery Time Objectives, a very strong case can be made for using a disk-based backup and recovery solution.

Phoenix-based Desert Schools Federal Credit Union (FCU), a top 30 U.S. credit union, is a great example of the benefits of moving to disk-based backup.  As profiled in IT Jungle’s Four Hundred Stuff newsletter, Desert Schools FCU formerly:

used a combination of tape backup and third-party encryption technologies to protect about 12 TB of confidential financial data. This data was spread across 392 servers running IBM i, VMware, and Windows environments. However, the backup routines failed to meet the credit union’s recovery time objective (RTO). This set the organization on a course of violating compliance requirements set forth by the National Credit Union Association.

After speaking with their local IT solutions provider, 3RP, Desert Schools FCU installed EVault Plug-n-Protect backup and recovery appliances to manage, backup and replicate data both locally and securely via the EVault Cloud while also meeting their RTO. And according to IT Jungle the subsequent results were impressive:

Desert Schools Federal Credit Union slashed its IBM i server backup times by more than 90 percent and its X64 server backup times by about 80 percent as a result of the implementation…It previously took 37 hours to back up the credit union’s core IBM i-based banking application, Fiserv Signature. Following the installation, it took three hours. Backup times for X64 systems dropped from 17 hours to about 3.5 hours, i365 said. What’s more, the move freed up the IT department’s time by more than 25 hours a month.

Have you made the move from tape backup? Let us know what the results were…

Share